By Ekuson Nw’Ogbunka, Abuja
The Nigerian Senate has faced widespread criticism for rejecting a motion to rename the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) headquarters after Prof. Humphrey Nwosu, the former chairman of the National Electoral Commission. Nwosu, who oversaw the historic June 12, 1993, presidential election, has been praised for his contributions to Nigeria’s democratic journey.
The Senate’s decision has sparked a heated debate about the recognition of Nwosu’s contributions to Nigeria’s electoral process. Many have argued that renaming the INEC headquarters after him would have been a fitting tribute to his dedication to democracy. The controversy has raised questions about the Senate’s priorities and its commitment to honouring the country’s democratic heroes.
However, Prince Orji Nwafor Orizu, Principal Partner at the Friends Chambers, expressed disappointment over the Senate’s actions. Speaking to journalists in Abuja over the weekend in his office, Nwafor- Orizu lamented the state of the Senate, citing instances where senators are not allowed to contribute to debates and issues being settled through voice votes without proper counting.
Orizu, a son of a former Senate President, emphasized the importance of following constitutional procedures, particularly in matters requiring a two-thirds majority vote. He questioned the Senate’s decision to settle issues through voice votes, which may not accurately reflect the will of the majority.
Orizu’s criticism comes on the heels of Prof Humphrey Nwosu’s refusal of honour by the Nigerian Senate. Nwosu, a key figure in the June 12, 1993, presidential election, was reportedly snubbed by the Senate, sparking widespread outrage.
The Nigerian Senate has faced criticism in recent times for its handling of various issues, including the treatment of senators and the passage of bills. Orizu’s comments highlight the need for the Senate to adhere to constitutional procedures and ensure that the voices of all senators are heard.
As the Nigerian Senate continues to face scrutiny, it remains to be seen how the institution will respond to Orizu’s criticisms and the controversy surrounding Prof Nwosu’s honour.
The controversy surrounding Prof. Humphrey Nwosu’s legacy has left a sour taste. Two issues stand out – firstly, the Nigerian Senate’s decision to relegate Nwosu’s role in the June 12, 1993, election to a solely Igbo affair. This oversight ignores the fact that individuals from various ethnic groups, driven by a shared commitment to Nigeria’s progress, supported Nwosu’s efforts.
Furthermore, the Senate’s handling of Nwosu’s honour raises questions about the legislative body’s decision-making process. The discrepancy between the senators’ affirmative vote and the presiding officer’s negative ruling is perplexing. It appears that the presiding officers might require a visit to the Ear, Nose and Throat (ENT) department to address any hearing impairments.
Despite the controversy, Prof. Humphrey Nwosu’s contributions to Nigeria’s democratic journey are undeniable. The fact that a few senators chose to rant against his honour does not diminish his legacy. It is heartening to note that President Tinubu sent a powerful delegation to Nwosu’s burial, a commendable act that acknowledges the late professor’s impact on Nigeria’s history.
In his humble opinion, the Senate would likely have granted Prof. Humphrey Nwosu the honour if Senate President Godswill Akpabio had presided that day, given his reputation for leadership and his past experiences as a governor and minister.
